Money should be spent on creating new public buildings such as museums or town halls rather than renovating the existing ones. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

I mostly disagree with the question statement as I believe that the government should revamp the current public structures like the museums or town halls

instead

of building new ones.

Although

, the common perception of people is that with the growing population and an increase in educational and technological advancement, new public buildings should be constructed, I,

however

think that the cons of

this

outweigh the pros.

First

and foremost, I anticipate that the construction of the new public buildings would be a sheer waste of taxpayer’s money. It would cost a hefty amount to build a structure, buy a new land and place, new artefacts and historical things in it.

Instead

of

this

, far less amount of money could be used to renovate an existing building by installing new technology in it, placing new artefacts, beautifying it and making it a tourist attraction.

This

would eventually help generate profits for the government and would

also

help the local community.

In addition

to the previous point, I firmly believe that revamping an existing building,

for example

a science museum, would give visitors a chance to both experience the old artefacts and old technology as well as the new developments in

this

field.

Similarly

, it would provide the viewers a different opportunity to compare the previous and latest technology. It would

further

help historians develop a contrast and analyse how much has changed over the course of time. Concluding the discussion, I would suggest that the taxpayer’s money should be put to other good uses

instead

of spending a large chunk of it on establishing new public buildings.