It is not wise for an industry to replace its experienced but old workers with new and young yet inexperienced individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Change is the law of nature and it applies to everyone including humans. While it appears unethical for an organization to replace its older employees with young people, I believe most of the times it becomes the need of the hour for that organization.
This
essay will analyse
this
trend from the perspective of workers and companies. From the perspective of a company, certain kinds of jobs are both physically and intellectually demanding and sometimes it becomes necessary to replace an older employee with a young employee in
such
jobs. Physically demanding jobs
such
as those of coal miners or construction workers need rigorous physical work which an aged person may not be able to do with the same efficiency as a young person. Mentally demanding jobs
such
as that of an air traffic controller or an emergency medical practitioner demand quick response and an inability to deliver it can cost lives. As
such
, in
such
cases, companies do not have any other options and the replacement of older employees is imperative.
However
, old and experienced employees ought to be retired gracefully with all the benefits rather than being shown the door one fine morning.
In other words
, it should be the prime responsibility of any enterprise to make sure their employees have a better life after their tenure is over with the enterprise.
For instance
, an organization should provide their experienced workers' regular monthly pension along with free medical facilities so that they are not dependent on others. Upon closer examination it can be seen that
this
practice helps not only the retired employees but
also
the government by helping it reduce its spending on elderly health care. To conclude, it is indeed true that replacement of older employees in various companies is a bitter truth in the co-operative sector.
Nonetheless
, its negative impacts on the lives of replacing employees can be alleviated with the patronage of their employers.
Submitted by nadinebalouly2002 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: