Banned
Plastic
In Not Always The Best Solution For
Environment
In 1950 the
world
produces plastics only 2
million
tonnes per year. Since
then
, annual production has increased nearly 200-fold, reaching 381
million
tonnes in 2015. For
contectdiscourse that surrounds a language unit and helps to determine its interpretation
,
this
is roughly equivalent to the mass of two thirds of the
world
population. Packaging was the dominant
use
of primary plastics, with 42 percent of plastics entering the
use
phase. Talking about the campaign to reduce the
plastic
used or
shopping
people with agree with the program. Beside there are a lot of advantages that we can
banned plastics, actually plastics
contributions
the
environment
like
pollution
in the land and ocean, similar problem that
if all the consumer
subtutuesupply (a movie) with subtitles
it
, and in term of the climate change.
Some people deny that the
plastic
bags used in supermarkets and shops have a negative effect on the
environment
because they do not know about degrade and end up as litter in our cities or oceans. Published in the journal Science in February 2015, a study conducted by a scientific working group at UC Santa Barbara’s National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (NCEAS), quantified the input of
plastic
waste from land into the ocean. The results: every year, 8
million
metric tons of
plastic
end up in our oceans. It’s equivalent to five grocery bags filled with
plastic
for every foot of coastline in the
world
.
2025, the annual input is estimated to be about twice greater, or 10 bags full of
plastic
per foot of coastline. So the cumulative input for 2025 would be nearly 20 times the 8
million
metric tons estimate – 100 bags of
plastic
per foot of coastline in the
world
. Banning
bags below a specific
thickenessthe dimension through an object as opposed to its length or width
is a prudent strategy to prevent
pollution
of land and water. These bags are so thin that they can get easily torn and
be
.
, they are not properly disposed and stay in the local ecosystem for more than 600 years.
This
often leads to
pollution
of underground water when rain
on these bags and absorb certain
plastic
material.
Moreover
, sometimes stray animal consume them and
fallundergo an emotional sensation or be in a particular state of mind
sick.
This
eventually to death of these animals and spread of disease among human population.
Most people who advocate banning
plastic
bags suggest paper bags (which are biodegradable) or reusable bags that are typically made from cotton or
plastic
. The replacements for
plastic
bags
also
carry significant environmental risks.Both of these replacements are flawed. Paper bags require us to continue clearing forests and
also
carry a large carbon footprint. Reusable bags are plagued by similar problems. Independent studies have shown that the production of cotton and reusable
plastic
causes more harm to the
environment
than disposable
plastic
bags. Coupled with the fact that reusable bags are more difficult to recycle, their overall effect on the
environment
is worse.
The final argument some people
ofenused as an intensive especially to indicate something unexpected
not know that
plastic
bags are non-
recycleablecapable of being used again
. In fact, not all the
plastic
bags are non-
recycleablecapable of being used again
. Those a certain thickness
and are easily and
hence
, they can be responsibly disposed and recycled.
should
regulation, people will continue to flout the recycling and minimum thickness norm. If these are properly recycled and
this
will not only reduce the mountain of the
plastic
waste of various dumping
pollution
of
and as well ground
pollution
.
This
is crucial, not only in understanding of the
implementing the most effective interventions for reduction.
However
,
instead
of banning
plastic
, it should be
, reduce, and more to reuse. Despite the advantages of banning
plastic
bags, the solutions for
plastic
bags are worse than the original problem. So,
use
what we have and
use
it
if it is broken we will fix it the big point is don’t
use
once and the we throw it.