In some countries a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that is good for a country, while other believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn.

A topic like really high incomes, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. It sparked the controversy in recent years as many people has different opinions and some agree with high salaries, while others think that these incomes are not justified in any way.
This
essay will discuss the both sides of the coin and reach to a fair conclusion based on facts and arguments. At the outset, there are numerous reasons why people think that the government should be involved in setting a limit on how much money an employee can earn,
however
the most conspicuous lies in the fact that there should be a balance between salaries and not a big gap, as most of the CEOs or politicians have unjustified salaries. As an example, in Romania politicians have incomes of millions of dollars, while the minimum economy salary is of a couple of hundred dollars and people can barely survive with what they earn.
Also
, the social gap is very high and the middle class earnings have disappeared completely in the
last
decade,
therefore
there are just rich and poor people. Are high salaries good for a country's economic development? Some people think that
this
is a way of measuring how well developed a country is and that no one should interfere with how much money someone can earn. If the employee is worth enough money to have a well-paid salary
this
should not represent an issue for anyone.
For instance
, some companies have a shortage of skilled workers and they have to find employees overseas and offer them good salary packages and relocation offers as well. In
this
way the company and the country will benefit in the long term; as the economy might bloom and
also
the company can have innovative products. From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that justified high salaries should not be a problem,
however
the government should intervene and reduce the extremely incomes which are earned without any justification.
Submitted by andranow2017 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • wealth inequality
  • economic growth
  • motivation
  • talent acquisition
  • consumer spending
  • tax revenue
  • redistributing wealth
  • market forces
  • income disparity
  • social stability
  • freedom of choice
  • meritocracy
What to do next:
Look at other essays: