Children nowadays spend a great deal of time watching television. However, television cannot replace the book as a learning tool, which is why children are less well‐educated today. To what extent do you agree with this statement?

One of the most controversial issues today relates to kids these days having much of time to interest in watching television. In

this

essay, I am going to examine

this

question from both points of view. On one side of the argument, there are people who argue that the benefits of transfer external world

culture

,

such

as, if they are living in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, they will learn the other country

culture

. Considerably outweigh its disadvantages. The main reason for believing

this

is that if the mothers having work, her children will busy about her, so she is finishing her work. It is

also

possible to say that arranging kids' time, as proof, every day, they will sleep at a suitable time. One good illustration of

this

is performed survey in 2002, kids have watched television, had possessed creative thinking.

On the other hand

, it is

also

possible to make the opposing case. It is often argued that in fact that, deliver

culture

that is

not appropriate with the identical societal

culture

.

For instance

, Saudi

culture

is dissimilarity from Egyptian

culture

. People often have

this

opinion because children inhibit leaving home to go to school.

In addition

, sleeping hours become not enough. A

second

point is that objection doing assignments.

Furthermore

, they have not connection with society. A particularly good example here is statistics in 2009, say that the children are registered in sport gym, they are 25 percentage. To sum up, as we have seen, there are no easy answers to

this

question. On balance,

however

, I tend to believe that I tend to believe that, it is not ordinary to depend on watching television as teaching or education vehicle.