Some people think that the government should provide assistance to all kinds of artists including painters, musicians and poets. However, other people think that this is a waste of money. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

An often debated topic is whether a

government

should provide its country’s

artists

with

assistance

or not. Many believe

such

assistance

is a prudent use of a nation’s wealth and should

thus

be supported.

However

, others feel

this

kind of spending is wasteful. Both sides of the argument will be discussed in

this

essay before a conclusion is reached.

According to

many,

government

funding of the arts can benefit a country’s cultural identity. A good example of

this

is the anime art culture of Japan. Today, anime is a globally recognized art form and as

such

, a huge draw for tourists. As

this

shows, providing

government

assistance

to

artists

can have positive ramifications across different channels within a country. It is

thus

understandable why many people support

this

stance.

On the other hand

, many argue

this

kind of spending is wasteful. The core of

this

argument typically spotlights developing countries. People basically feel that among these countries

government

money may perhaps best be used to solve social problems,

such

as establishing safe drinking water and roads to rural communities. When looking at the discussion in

this

light, the merits

in

Change preposition

of

show examples

not utilizing

government

funds on

artists

can be seen. After examining both sides of the question, it is felt that in most circumstances

government

assistance

to

artists

begets greater benefits to the country at large.

Thus

, it is hoped nations around the world responsibly tailor financial aid to their

artists

in a

manor

Correct your spelling

manner

show examples

that best benefits the needs of their people.