Wealthy countries should accept more refugees and provide them with basic assistance, such as food and housing. To what extend do you agree or disagree?

It is argued that rich nations should allow higher numbers of refugees and provide them with adequate humanitarian

aid

.

This

essay

agrees with

this

statement

because richer nations have ample resources and

infrastructure

to

support

this

cause

.

To begin

with, wealthy nations have an abundant

food

supply to

support

their citizens.

However

,

this

excessive supply has

also

led to massive amounts of meal

wastage

.

Instead

of wasting these resources, governments of wealthy countries could allocate some of these supplies to people in dire need of help.

For

example

, during the holy

month

of

Ramadan

, some rich Arab nations prepare huge banquets for their citizens where 30% of the

food

is wasted in decorations and later thrown away. Another important

point

to consider is that rich countries have well developed housing and

infrastructure

facilities.

In other words

, these nations are more than capable of handling an

inflow

of immigrants without reducing their

quality

of

life

. Allocating a small

section

of

land

to these helpless beings would be a sensible and humane

gesture

.

For

example

, only a

third

of

land

in Australia is populated, with the vast

majority

of its

mainland

uninhabited.

This

means that it has enough

land

to accommodate additional immigrants without disrupting its

economy

. In

conclusion

, it is evident that countries with a strong

economy

can accept more refugees, and are more than capable of providing them with

food

and

shelter

. Regardless, it is a moral

responsibility

of every human being to

support

each other in times of need. It is argued that rich nations should allow because richer nations have ample resources and

infrastructure

to

support

this

cause

. To b

eginn

take the first step or steps in carrying out an action

begin

bargain

with, wealthy nations have a

bundant

Suggestion

an abundant food supply

food

supply to

support

their citizens.

However

,

this

excessive supply has

also

led to massive amounts of

food

wastage

.

Instead

of wasting these resources, governments of wealthy countries could allocate some of these supplies to people in dire need of help.

For

example

, during the holy

month

of

Ramadan

, some rich Arab nations prepare huge banquets for their citizens where 30% of the

food

is wasted in decorations and later thrown away. Another important

point

to consider is that rich countries have well developed housing and

infrastructure

facilities.

In other words

, these nations are more than capable of handling an

inflow

of immigrants without reducing their

quality

of

life

. Allocating a small

section

of

land

to these helpless beings would be a sensible and humane

gesture

.

For

example

, only a

third

of

land

in Australia is populated, with the vast

majority

of its

mainland

uninhabited.

This

means that it has enough

land

to accommodate additional immigrants without disrupting its

economy

. In

conclusion

, it is evident that countries with a strong

economy

can accept more refugees, and are more than capable of providing them with

food

and

shelter

. Regardless, it is a moral

responsibility

of every human being to

support

each other in times of need. It is argued that rich nations should allow higher numbers of refugees and provide them with adequate humanitarian

aid

.

This

essay

agrees with

this

statement

because richer nations have ample resources and

infrastructure

to

support

this

cause

.

To begin

with, wealthy nations have a

bundant foodd supply

Suggestion

an abundant food supply

abundant food supply

to

support

their citizens.

However

,

this

excessive supply has

also

led to massive amounts of

food

wastage

.

Instead

of wasting these resources, governments of wealthy countries could allocate some of these supplies to people in dire need of help.

For

example

, during the holy

month

of

Ramadan

, some rich Arab nations prepare huge banquets for their citizens where 30% of the

food

is wasted in decorations and later thrown away. Another important

point

to consider is that rich countries have well developed housing and

infrastructure

facilities.

In other words

, these nations are more than capable of handling an

inflow

of immigrants without reducing their

quality

of

life

. Allocating a small

section

of

land

to these helpless beings would be a sensible and humane

gesture

.

For

example

, only a

third

of

land

in Australia is populated, with the vast

majority

of its

mainland

uninhabited.

This

means that it has enough

land

to accommodate additional immigrants without disrupting its

economy

. In

conclusion

, it is evident that countries with a strong

economy

can accept more refugees, and are more than capable of providing them with

food

and

shelter

. Regardless, it is a moral

responsibility

of every human being to

support

each other in times of need. It is argued that rich nations should allow higher numbers of refugees and provide them with adequate humanitarian

aid

.

This

essay

agrees with

this

statement

because richer nations have ample resources and

infrastructure

to

support

this

cause

.

To begin

with, wealthy nations have a

bundant

Suggestion

an abundant food supply

food

supply to

support

their citizens.

However

,

this

excessive supply has

also

led to massive amounts of f

oodd

Suggestion

food d

wastage

.

Instead

of wasting these resources, governments of wealthy countries could allocate some of these supplies to people in dire need of help.

For

example

, during the holy

month

of

Ramadan

, some rich Arab nations prepare huge banquets for their citizens where 30% of the

food

is wasted in decorations and later thrown away. Another important

point

to consider is that rich countries have well developed housing and

infrastructure

facilities.

In other words

, these nations are more than capable of handling an

inflow

of immigrants without reducing their

quality

of

life

. Allocating a small

section

of

land

to these helpless beings would be a sensible and humane

gesture

.

For

example

, only a

third

of

land

in Australia is populated, with the vast

majority

of its

mainland

uninhabited.

This

means that it has enough

land

to accommodate additional immigrants without disrupting its

economy

. In

conclusion

, it is evident that countries with a strong

economy

can accept more refugees, and are more than capable of providing them with

food

and

shelter

. Regardless, it is a moral

responsibility

of every human being to

support

each other in times of need. It is argued that rich nations should allow higher numbers of refugees and provide them with adequate humanitarian

aid

.

This

essay

agrees with

this

statement

because richer nations have ample resources and

infrastructure

to

support

this

cause

.

To begin

with, wealthy nations have a

bundant

Suggestion

an abundant food supply

food

supply to

support

their citizens.

However

,

this

excessive supply has

also

led to massive amounts of

food

wastage

.

Instead

of wasting these resources, governments of wealthy countries could allocate some of these supplies to people in dire need of help.

For

example

, during the holy

month

of

Ramadan

, some rich Arab nations prepare huge banquets for their citizens where 30% of the f

oodd

any substance that can be metabolized by an animal to give energy and build tissue

food

foods

flood

is wasted in decorations and later thrown away. Another important

point

to consider is that rich countries have well developed housing and

infrastructure

facilities.

In other words

, these nations are more than capable of handling an

inflow

of immigrants without reducing their

quality

of

life

. Allocating a small

section

of

land

to these helpless beings would be a sensible and humane

gesture

.

For

example

, only a

third

of

land

in Australia is populated, with the vast

majority

of its

mainland

uninhabited.

This

means that it has enough

land

to accommodate additional immigrants without disrupting its

economy

. In

conclusion

, it is evident that countries with a strong

economy

can accept more refugees, and are more than capable of providing them with

food

and

shelter

. Regardless, it is a moral

responsibility

of every human being to

support

each other in times of need.