World history suggests that violance and conflict were more evident under male leadership. So, for peace to prevail, female leadership can be considered as a better option than male leadership. To what extent do u agree or disagree.

The human

history

has been violence and conflict-stricken since the beginning of the human existence. If we look back in

history

or to the world around us, we see wars, conflict,

power

struggles and revolutions,

peace

making kings, prudent emperors and ruthless rulers.

History

also

reveals that society has always been predominantly male dominated, with leaders and rulers mainly being men. It is,

hence

, easy to blame the ruler and put the responsibility of atrocities on the shoulders of men. But a deeper perspective always reveals to historians that conflict is a

generic

occurring among members of a family usually by heredity

genetic

tendency of humans. So

peace

being disturbed is not the liability of men only, but humans in general, and a

power

shift, from men to women,

is destined

Suggestion

are destined

to be futile in prevailing

peace

. Most of the women who are known to be great till date, e.g. Queen Isabella of Spain, Queen Mary, a.k.a. Bloody Mary, Victoria, and Elizabeth of Britain, all have ruled over a vast spectrum of

power

. And they often have done so ruthlessly, achieving goals with an iron hand. They have waged wars that are barely comparable to only a few of those devised by men. These women are not anomalies of

history

, but examples from numerous others, who went beyond the boundaries of gender in the path of prevailing in

power

while expanding

peace

whenever they deemed it to be expandable. The two greatest wars of modern

history

, World Wars I & II, have taught us that wars are impersonal. Race, religion, nationality, sex

are

Suggestion

is

only pretences to the universally human lust for

power

. It is true that during both the global conflicts men were in the rulers’ thrones. But it will be foolish to say that Margaret Thatcher, the famed Iron Lady who spared no road against a minnow enemy in the war of Falkland, would be

more peacefully

Suggestion

more peaceful

diplomatic than how the greats Winston Churchill and Franklyn D. Roosevelt had been tackling the Axis of Hitler. The gender issue is only a determinant in the battle of the sexes, not the battles among nations and peoples. It

is

Accept comma addition

is, therefore

therefore

, impertinent, if not irrational, to conclude that world conflicts result from the rule of a particular gender and the finer sex would do a better job at prevailing

peace

if selectively put at the helm of human nations.