Some people believe that some unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programs (e.g. working in a charity, improving the relationship of neighborhood or teaching sports to children). To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Many people opine that high schools ought to incorporate certain unpaid public service in their curricula compulsorily. I completely agree with

this

assertion and I will elaborate reasons below. In the

first

place, I would argue that these works are beneficial for students as they are able to enhance the cooperative spirit among students.

In other words

, those youngsters who are working together in

this

kind of community service have an ample opportunity of understanding each other and exchanging their ideas efficiently. By doing so, they will have a very good chance to broaden their horizons in a sufficient manner. In the future, these kinds of young people will be successful in their future prospects

such

as promotion in their workplace. In the

second

place, I believe that

such

voluntary jobs will benefit everyone concerned as well as society. By doing

such

kinds of jobs, pupils will be able to gain valuable work experience which is absolutely essential for them to be successful in job hunting. What is more, the certain sections of the population can see definite advantages of these public services. One good illustration of

this

is that the elderly cannot take care of themselves properly.

Therefore

, by means of these works, students might feel the strong sense of responsibility for taking an active part in assisting the public as a whole. In conclusion, as the analysed reasons above, I strongly support the idea that public services which are free of charge should be the mandatory proportion of high school curriculum.