Some people argue that job satisfaction is more important than job security, while others believe that they cannot always expect job satisfaction and a permanent job is more important. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Nowadays, an increasing number of people are concerned about how to stabilise the

job

position.

However

, whether we should put the

job

security in the

first

place has become a controversial issue. I agree with the view that

job

satisfaction is far more important for employees.

Firstly

, it is obvious that people who are doing

improper

Suggestion

an improper job

job

will not be satisfied with it. The staff in the company will find that he

can not

can not

cannot

maximise his talent, which will bring negative effect on his working ability.

Therefore

, the intrinsic

job

dissatisfaction will do harm both to individual and organisation, even though the

job

is permanent.

Moreover

, sometimes the

job

dissatisfaction comes from outside factors

such

as the stressful relationship with superiors and colleagues, low salary and uncomfortable working environment, which will

also

dismantle the enthusiasm and vitality in the workplace.

As a result

, the working efficiency and productivity will

also

be decreased. So

this

kind of extrinsic

job

dissatisfaction should be avoided too.

That is

not to say that the

job

security is not desirable at all. Some people prefer to have a permanent

job

without worrying about getting fired so that they could spare no efforts to work. But to be honest,

this

situation is to some extent kind of idealism. In sum,

job

satisfaction is far more important than

job

security as long as we want to boost the economy; meanwhile, we should not forget to provide the guaranteed position for the benefit of workers. Only by doing so can we ensure that every employee in the workplace can make the most contribution.