There are social consequences to housing shortages in cities and only the government can solve the problems.

Several people hold the opinion that housing deficit precipitates detrimental social outcomes in metropolitan areas and

only the government are

Suggestion

the government are only

capable of tackling

this

issue. From my point of view,

such

a

disastrous

Suggestion

disaster

lacking of accommodation is that only the authority can bear the burden of responsibility. Only governmental housing policy is able to be implemented to have careful urban planning by encouraging vertical development and restricting horizontal one. Blocks of apartments save a great amount of space and provide residents in need of shelters, affordable and clean houses.

This

means damaged as well as old places being on the verge of collapsing have to be destroyed to promote

this

positive substitution, which can only be achieved by the governmental intervention.

Furthermore

, regulations on restricting building landed houses is considerably necessary should numerous apartments be built. Another realistic measure to confront the inadequate supply of decent shelters is to reduce migration. The laws impose on moving industry to the countryside.

For instance

, the industrial factory, But Son cement is located in the suburb of Phu Ly city because of not only the convenient resources but

also

the benefits of dwellers living in there.

In addition

, only the government agency has enough power and money to empower the rural area with facilities for higher living standard;

for example

, upgrading transport systems or investing in entertainment. In conclusion

,

Accept space

,

the government is the major catalyst for all housing problems in overcrowded cities by logically planning houses and decreasing the number of immigrants.

Such

actions need to be taken to deal with

this

problem before it becomes unsolvable.