In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There is no doubt that there is a significant increase in health problems since people consume a large quantity of convenience
food
. There are some people who think that governments should vigorously enforce a higher
tax
against the company of fast
food
, while others state that
this
is not the case. In
this
essay, I will completely agree with the latter view. The
first
point to make is that, in general, a heightened
tax
on fast
food
alone may only place an onerous financial burden on the residents. To explain, compared to natural
food
, the average price of junk foods may still cheaper than natural
food
despite the fact that the price of fast
food
would grow significantly by a new
tax
.
For example
, consumers will change expenditure when these changes are inexpensive.
As a result
, if a new levy policy was applied to ready-to-eat foods, it would force the average-income working people pay more for their daily meals. Another compelling point is that consumers may still favour fast
food
for the ease of life it brings. To be more specific, as opposed to
food
at home, which is good for health, they choose fast
food
for the convenience because they have less time to cook in their daily meals. To illustrate, the middle and lower class people sacrificed for the sake of time-saving;
Thus
, convenience is perhaps the most significant a decisive factor when the majority of the prevalence opts for what to eat on a regular basis.
Consequently
, if the taxation schemes imposed, convenient foods would be gone the intrinsic value of being ‘fast’. In conclusion,
this
essay supports the idea that an intensified
tax
on deleterious precooked
food
is a realistic preventive measure it may only lead to heavier routine expenditure of the payers.
Therefore
, other nutritious diets should be made cheaper and more convenient.
Submitted by 1870420 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: