Increasing price of the petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures that you think might be effective ?

It is sometimes argued that raising the

cost

of fossil fuel is the most effective solution for environmental and problems on the roads these days. While I agree that

this

method is extremely successful in decreasing the

amount

Change the quantifier

number

show examples

of exhaust fumes that were emitted and the number of traffic congestion, I believe that there are other possible measures that have similar results. There are various reasons why

rising

Correct your spelling

raising

show examples

the price of

energy

resource is considered to be a superior measure.

To begin

with,

the

Remove the article

apply

show examples

excessive exhaust fumes is the main factor that contributes to

the

Remove the article

apply

show examples

pollution and environment degradation.

Therefore

, escalating the price of renewable power could directly

discourages

Change the verb form

discourage

show examples

citizens from purchasing and using private transports regularly.

Consequently

, not only the

quantity

Change the quantifier

number

show examples

of personal vehicles but

also

the amount of carbon dioxide will experience a decline,

hence

alleviate the pollution issue.

Furthermore

, the higher

cost

of

r

Add an article

the

show examples

esource, the

less

Change the quantifier

fewer

show examples

residents driving their means of transport since the

traveling

Change the spelling

travelling

show examples

cost

by cars is

significant

Change the adjective

significantly

show examples

more than buses or trains,

thus

reduce traffic problems.

For example

,

instead

of spending 30 dollars

for

Verify preposition usage

on

show examples

fuels, people are likely to pay 6 dollars

for

Verify preposition usage

apply

show examples

to travel by public transport

such

as train in order to save money. Despite the above arguments, I believe that there are other solutions that share

the

Change the article

a

show examples

similar effect.

Firstly

, the administration should introduce

a

Remove the article

apply

show examples

legislation that

decline

Change the verb form

declines

show examples

the ticket

cost

to entice citizens into public transports. In fact,

this

method when coped with the growth of

energy

price could hinder the individuals from using personal vehicles effectively, results in the pollutant and traffic issues depletion.

Secondly

,

g

Add an article

the

show examples

overnment can invest in researching an alternative renewable supply that could benefit the environment.

For instance

,

hydro power

Correct your spelling

hydropower

show examples

, water or wind

energy

are expected to have

the

Remove the article

apply

show examples

similar productivity and emit less carbon dioxide compared to gasoline. As a consequence, the threat of fuels consumption as well as pollution can be alleviated. In conclusion, while increasing the nonrenewable

energy

cost

is advantageous for certain reasons, I do not believe that it is the only method that could benefit the environment and decrease

on

Verify preposition usage

apply

show examples

road congestion.