Some people think that a huge a mount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals, and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

There are many arguments around the question of whether people should spend a huge amount of
money
on protecting wild animals or use expenditure on the survival of humankind. In my perspective, people should keep balancing the resources allocated for human and other species. On the one hand,
money
and effort should be spent on the welfare of
human
Replace the word
humanity
show examples
.
Firstly
, there are still various problems which need to be solved in
this
society. Many undeveloped countries possess high-rate of homelessness and poverty. Many lives are facing death because of starvation.
As a result
, the government should focus on raising funds to help poor people to overcome the situation rather than pay attention to wild animals.
Secondly
, animals living in wild are one of the culprits of food loss in farms. They eat crops, destroy many farms, which reduce the quality and quantity of agricultural products.
Therefore
, spending
money
to protect wild species is sometimes unnecessary.
On the other hand
, people
also
need to make
b
Add an article
a
show examples
ig effort to protect wildlife. One of the reason is that protecting other animals will help humankind preserve rare gene resources, which benefit people in many aspects. By researching and experiments, scientists could create ne vaccine on medicine to cure many patients thanks to these genes. Another reason why people should use expenditure on the wild animal is to preserve biodiversity. Some of the animals are essential for human well-being. If they do not exist on earth in the future, the survival of human can be threatened.
For example
, if bees disappear, people can only survive for about 3 years according to researches. In conclusion, people should consider carefully about the quantity of
money
and time invested in society and wildlife.
Submitted by nigareliqizi on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • biodiversity
  • ecosystem balance
  • natural habitats
  • conservation
  • sustainable development
  • ecotourism
  • poverty alleviation
  • underprivileged
  • moral obligation
  • environmental awareness
  • long-term investment
  • natural world
What to do next:
Look at other essays: