Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later, and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is true that ex-prisoners can become normal, productive members of society. Some
people
believe those
people
are the most suitable one to have a talk with adolescents about
d
Add an article
the
show examples
angers of committing a crime. From my perspective, I completely agree that those
people
should talk to
teenagers
for the purpose of discouraging them from breaking the law. On the one hand,
teenagers
are more likely to accept advice from someone who can speak from experience. Reformed offenders can tell young
people
about how they involved in crime, the dangers of
c
Add an article
a
the
show examples
riminal lifestyle, and what life in prison is really like. While
teenagers
are often indifferent to the guidance given by older
people
, most of
s
Add an article
the
show examples
tudents are keen to hear the stories of an ex-offender. The vivid and shocking nature of these stories is likely to have a powerful impact.
On the other hand
,
the
Remove the article
apply
show examples
alternative methods to guide adolescents are less effective. One option would be for officers
v
Add the particle
to
show examples
isit
s
Add an article
the
a
show examples
chool and discuss with
students
there, which can give information about how they caught criminals and suggest to peers from an authority
side
Correct your spelling
site
show examples
. The
second
method tends to be for schoolteachers
s
Add the particle
to
show examples
peak to their
students
about crime, but effectiveness is doubted as
students
might not see teachers as a credible source of information.
Finally
, educational films can be used, but there is no opportunity for
students
to interact. In conclusion, I fully agree that ex-prisoners should talk to
teenagers
in their school
,
Remove the comma
apply
show examples
since it is the most effective and efficient way to deter
teenagers
from committing crimes.
Submitted by Esther on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • prisoners
  • rehabilitation
  • recidivism
  • consequences
  • insights
  • deterrent
  • guidance
  • support
  • role models
  • positive change
What to do next:
Look at other essays: