In today's job market it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge. In the future, job applications may not need any formal qualifications. To what extent, do you agree or disagree?

The variety of working content has emerged to influence the individual career choice, and the decision recruiting an employee made by a
company
hardly depends on the degree achieved by a
candidate
.
Instead
, the increasing concern will be focusing on the outcome produced by an employee rather than a certificate. In my opinion, the importance of working technique practised, which I strongly agreed, has outweighed the integration of knowledge learned from universities or colleges.
To begin
with, due to the expectation of hiring an employee, a
candidate
who has equipped practical
skills
would be exceedingly preferred in terms of enhancing the productivity of a
company
.
For instance
, occupations, like operating data analysis or holding a marketing event, require down-to-earth problem-solving methods
instead
of the solution conveyed by a case study printed on the textbook. In short, practical
skills
means efficiency.
Moreover
, the capability of taking risks could be supported by the candidates who have certain experience or responsive
skills
to implement,
thus
, the financial and time cost could be saved. A clear example is showing that no matter the international companies or start-up companies, hiring a sophisticated
candidate
would be regarded as an economic choice to make.
However
, especially in the industry of high technology, what a
candidate
has firmly learnt is the essential support for mastering a certain skill.
For example
, a sophisticated researcher needs to learn, at least four years, basic knowledge on semi-conductor manufacture before participating in the process of developing a chip embedded in the smart devices.
That is
to say, examining the practical
skills
would be equivalent to testing the theoretical knowledge in respect of satisfying the different requirements during the recruitment. In conclusion, as far as I am concerned, the profit and effectiveness of a
company
considerably rely on the achievement obtained by experienced workers, who would draw more attention, in the future, on the perspective of the human resource of a
company
.
Submitted by Welkin on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: