Some feel governments, rather than private companies, should be in charge of medical services. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some hold the view that medical
services
should be provided by governments rather than private corporations, while others state that clinics should be run by a private sector. I partially disagree with
this
statement for the following reasons. Admittedly, medical businesses provided by authorities rather than private companies have an advantage because the prices of
services
can be stabilised. Since private businesses are affected by economic conditions, the prices can fluctuate. On some occasions, low-income households cannot afford to see doctors.
This
is well exemplified by the American case. Health insurance is run by the private sector, and a great number of people cannot receive medical assistance because they are hesitant to purchase exorbitant insurance.
Thus
, medical operations by institutions enable every citizen to access medical facilities.
On the other hand
, I believe medical utilities should be conducted by private corporations because governmental management can lessen the opportunities to pursue better
services
. Private companies make the best effort for improving medical techniques and
services
to survive a fierce market. The lack of competition can deteriorate the industry's medical standard.
For example
, at my neighbour medical centre, there was always a long queue, and it made customers wait for a couple of hours.
However
, after numerous complaints by patients, the centre introduced an internet booking system so that customers can visit without any wait.
This
example illustrates that intensive private sector's competition prompts them to meet customers' demand immediately. In conclusion, I partially disagree with
this
statement because authorities' medical supply guarantee
the
Correct article usage
a
show examples
fixed price;
however
, they discourage doctors to hone their skills and
services
.
Submitted by yukappy.961106 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • fundamental human right
  • equitable access
  • government-run healthcare
  • economies of scale
  • negotiate
  • healthcare costs
  • profit motives
  • compromised healthcare
  • health inequities
  • accountable
  • public health objectives
  • reinvest
  • infrastructure
What to do next:
Look at other essays: