Governments should spend more money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some

people

say that the government ought to allocate more of

their

Correct pronoun usage

its

show examples

budget to

rail

Add an article

the rail

show examples

than roadways. I totally disagree with

this

statement because trains are faster and more environmentally friendly. Investing in a modern train system will mean that

people

can get around a country faster.

This

is because train passengers do not have to deal with the congestion most road users experience and trains can achieve much higher speeds than cars.

Therefore

,

people

will spend less time commuting and more time doing something more productive and

this

will benefit the entire society.

For example

, the British Government recently unveiled plans to connect cities in the North of England with London via a high-speed rail network and

this

will reduce commuting times by half, allowing thousands of

people

in the Midlands to work in London. Locomotives tend to be less harmful to the environment than cars.

This

is due to the fact that a train can carry hundreds of passengers and

this

prevents the use of hundreds of internal combustion engines,

thus

reducing the number of carbon emissions. If

this

is repeated every day over many different routes, the reduction in carbon footprint is highly significant.

For instance

, Ho Chi Minh City will soon open its

first

underground metro service and

this

will reduce the number of cars and motorbikes on the road. One of the main benefits to the city will be an improvement in carbon dioxide levels because of the reduction in traffic. In conclusion, the State should divert more funds to railway systems and spend less

on road

Add a hyphen

on-road

show examples

transportation as

this

will improve journey times and

also

be less harmful to the environment.