IELTS Opinion Writing Samples Band 7.5

Want to improve your IELTS score? Get instant feedback and learn from your mistakes!
The age at which children should start formal schooling is a question that divides parents and educators alike. While some argue that an early start gives children a valuable academic head start, others maintain that childhood should be protected from the pressures of the classroom. In my view, although early exposure to learning has clear benefits, a slightly later and gentler start is healthier for most children. Those who favour starting school early point out that young children absorb information remarkably quickly. A child who begins reading and counting at four or five often develops strong foundations that make later study easier, and structured lessons can also teach discipline and social skills that are difficult to acquire at home. In countries where children start school at four, supporters claim that this early routine helps them adjust smoothly to academic life. On the other hand, many experts believe that pushing children into formal lessons too soon can do more harm ...
Some people argue that wild animals are no longer relevant in the 21st century and that spending money on their protection is a waste of resources. I strongly disagree with this view. Although wildlife conservation does require financial investment, it is necessary for environmental stability and can also bring long-term economic benefits.
It is believed that the sole reason for learning a foreign language is to travel to or work in a foreign country. However, others believe that these are not the only reasons why people should learn another language. I hold the view that there are many other reasons for learning a foreign language, and I will explain why.
Historical films and television dramas have become increasingly popular because they present historical events in an engaging and accessible way. While these productions can spark public interest in history and provide a basic understanding of the past, I strongly disagree that they can replace historical books as a source of knowledge.
As cities become increasingly populated, urban land is being used in more diverse ways to meet residents' needs. One growing trend is the conversion of public parks and open spaces into community gardens for growing fruit and vegetables. Although this development inevitably reduces the amount of recreational space available, I believe its overall benefits are greater.
Although in recent days a significant amount of advertisements aim at children, a number of people contend that it has an adverse effect on the children and should be prohibited. I strongly disagree with this because not only does it allow for social exposure, but it also boosts decision-making.
While it is true that television affects children, it is difficult to determine whether the content of programmes or the amount of time spent watching has a greater impact. I believe that although viewing time does have negative effects, the content of TV programmes is more influential.
Although smoking in public is a danger to the health of others, in certain public places, the overwhelming majority of people would also consider the use of mobile phones as antisocial behaviour. While I agree that a restriction on using mobile phones is sometimes necessary, I believe that a blanket ban should not be imposed.
Cosmetic surgery has become more common in recent years as people want to change their appearances. This essay will explain the reasons behind this circumstance and discuss its negative impacts.
There has been a long-standing debate about whether students should study in groups or individually. While some people believe that group study enhances learning through collaboration, others argue that studying alone allows better focus and independence. In this essay, both sides will be examined before reaching a well-reasoned conclusion.
There is an ongoing debate regarding how governments should allocate taxpayer money. Some people believe that prioritising health care is beneficial for society. While others argue that allocating taxpayers’ money to other sectors may have negative consequences. Therefore, before giving my own opinion . I would like to discuss both perspectives.
As humanity faces escalating environmental crises and the long-term uncertainty of life on Earth, some people argue that governments should invest heavily in the search for another habitable planet, while others believe that protecting the Earth itself should remain the top priority. Although the exploration of alternative planets may offer potential benefits for the distant future, I strongly believe that allocating public funds to environmental preservation is both more practical and more urgent.
Some people believe that reading for pleasure helps individuals develop stronger imaginations and better language skills than watching television. I strongly agree with this view because reading actively engages the mind and significantly improves vocabulary and communication abilities.
Access to clean water is widely regarded as a fundamental human right because it is essential for survival, health, and dignity. While I strongly agree that everyone should have access to safe drinking water, I disagree that all household water supplies should be provided entirely free of charge.
It is often argued that taking risks is essential for success in both professional and personal life. While risk-taking can sometimes lead to failure and financial or emotional losses, I believe that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages because it promotes personal growth, creates opportunities, and contributes to long-term success.
A school of thought holds that having friends with the same individual's opinions is better than those with opposite views. This essay will elaborate on both sides of the matter before concluding my viewpoints.
It is often claimed that wild animals have little value in the twenty-first century and that resources devoted to their conservation could be better spent elsewhere. I completely disagree with this perspective because preserving wildlife is essential for ecosystem stability and remains highly beneficial to human societies.
There is an ongoing debate about whether schools should limit their role to teaching academic subjects or also take responsibility for helping students distinguish right from wrong. While I understand the argument that schools should prioritise academic achievement, I believe moral education is also an essential part of a well-rounded education.
In recent years, there has been an ongoing debate about whether students should be given the freedom to choose between academic and vocational courses during secondary education. As societies require both highly educated professionals and skilled workers, educational systems are becoming more diverse. I strongly agree that students should be allowed to select either academic subjects that prepare them for university or practical courses that lead directly to employment. This essay will discuss how such flexibility benefits individual students and society as a whole.
Many people argue that artists should receive financial support from the government, while others contend that public funds should be allocated to more essential sectors and that spending taxpayers' money on the arts is unjustified. This essay will discuss both viewpoints before explaining why I believe government resources should primarily be directed towards areas of greater public necessity.
🚀 Prepare for IELTS writing section today!
  • Unlimited Task 1 & Task 2 checks
    Practice with essays, charts, and letters.
  • Personalized suggestions & mistake analysis
    Spot every mistake and boost your score.
  • Topic ideas & vocabulary helpers
    Expand your ideas and use the right words.
  • Progress tracking
    Watch your writing improve with every practice.