Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

It is believed that government investment should be channelled into railway renovation,
instead
of lane construction. I am of the opinion that the revitalization of roads should be taken precedence over that of
railways
for numerous reasons. From a social perspective, the ubiquity of lane transportation is undeniable since domestic merchandise, goods, or products are transferred to consumers by vehicles operated above the roads. In long-term objectives, if the authorities restrain the total amount of budget invested in
this
sort of public infrastructure, the flow of product chains, as well as domestic businesses' revenue, will come to a halt.
Besides
, for the sake of commuters, more often than not, people are inclined to drive motorcycles and cars in order to travel from place to place.
Thus
, the likelihood of increasing fatal rates is a result of inadequate investment in road construction and renovation because citizens can easily get injured by inadvertently heading into pot-holes.
In contrast
, advocates of the statement
also
hold the view that the government should make capital investments in
railways
instead
of the other as it plays a fundamental role in favour of exportation and free trade agreements. Specifically,
railways
can be utilized to transfer
merchandises
Fix the agreement mistake
merchandise
show examples
from a foreign country in which is geographically in proximity to the host nation without dissipation of energy and resources.
Nevertheless
, there are a plethora of alternative modes of transport
such
as airways and waterways.
Consequently
, governments should cut down on the budget allocated to an unnecessary option and prioritize the most common way of transportation, especially roadways. In conclusion, governmental investment in
railways
is by no means a squandering;
however
, due to the world's economic predicament, the authorities should channel money into roadways for social and national sakes.
Submitted by shirley141200 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • Carbon emissions
  • Mass transportation
  • Traffic congestion
  • Economic growth
  • Regional development
  • Initial investment
  • Feasibility
  • Flexibility
  • Rural areas
  • Integration
  • Sustainable
  • Efficiency
  • Infrastructure
  • Commuters
  • Public expenditure
  • Autonomous vehicles
  • Long-term investment
  • Accessibility
  • Connectivity
  • Modal shift
What to do next:
Look at other essays: