Wealthy countries should accept more refugees and provide them with basic assistance, such as food and housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is argued that rich nations ought to allow greater numbers of forced migrants past their borders and give them humanitarian relief.

This

essay totally agrees with

this

opinion because it is the morally correct thing to do and it will

also

help their economy in the long term. Refugees are fleeing their homeland because of war and famine.

This

means that many of these people will die or come to serious harm if they are not accepted by

western

Capitalize word

Western

show examples

states and it is

therefore

moral imperative that they allow them in.

That is

to say that if they do not shelter and feed them they would be responsible for many deaths and terrible suffering.

For example

, migrants from Syria are escaping a brutal war and

this

is the reason why Germany and other European countries have decided to grant hundreds of thousands of them asylum. Thousands of extra people coming into a country will

also

help boost the economy.

This

is because there will be more workers available and they will, in turn, pay tax and

also

buy goods and services in that country. They may need extra financial support in the beginning, but

this

will be paid back many times over if they stay and work. For example, millions of Vietnamese people were forced to leave their homeland in the 1970s and many of them have established thriving businesses in the USA which pay billions of dollars in

tax

Fix the agreement mistake

taxes

show examples

every year. In conclusion, refugees should be accepted with open arms by countries in the western hemisphere because it is the right thing to do on moral grounds and it will

also

benefit the host countries monetarily in the future.