Evaluate the usefulness of Bigelow and La Gaipa’s work for understanding children’s friendship

In the 70s, relationship
research
in the field of psychology focused mainly on the study of emotional bonds between people.
Researchers
reduced the role of
children
's
friendship
to the question of what makes them feel attracted to each other
?
Change the punctuation
.
show examples
Understanding the phenomenon of
friendship
in the context of psychology was very limited. In 1975, Brian
Bigelow
and John La
Gaipa
researched changes in the way
children
perceive and define
friendship
depending on their age and stage of development.
This
essay
will evaluate the usefulness of their findings and
its
Correct pronoun usage
their
show examples
further
influence on the process of shaping the understanding of
children
's friendships.
Initially
,
Bigelow
and La
Gaipa
's intention was to explore the differences in
children
's expectations towards their best friends at different stages of development.
Researchers
were particularly interested in exploring changes in the perception of friendships that occur as
the
Correct article usage
apply
show examples
children
grow up. Equally, their innovative
research
has opened a new chapter in understanding child
friendship
- an issue that has been completely unnoticed by psychology up to
this
point. To explore how
children
understand
friendship
,
Bigelow
and La
Gaipa
asked them to write an
essay
, describing the relationship with the
same sex
Add a hyphen
same-sex
show examples
best friend. Their task was to indicate the differences between expectations towards best
friend
Fix the agreement mistake
friends
show examples
and other colleagues.
However
,
researchers
did not consider
friendship
between
children
of different sexes, which could have an impact on the results of their
research
. To conduct
research
,
Bigelow
and La
Gaipa
collected 480 essays written by
children
of different sexes at the age between 6 to 14 years. They came from lower-middle-class and upper-working-class families. Eight different schools based in Windsor, Ontario, Canada joined the study. 30 boys and 30 girls were appointed from each of them to take part. A large sample group was undoubtedly an asset.
However
, the method of selecting participants for the studies could result in a sampling error. The
research
has
also
devalued the influence of culture in understanding
children
's
friendship
Fix the agreement mistake
friendships
show examples
. Before
Bigelow
and La
Gaipa
began the studies, they created a list of different characteristics that
children
could want to include when describing their best friend.
Researchers
divided the list into 21 categories and
then
used content analysis in each
essay
.
Furthermore
, they were able to quickly analyse samples of 480 essays by subordinating characteristics to already defined categories and applying frequency count. An additional advantage of the method used was the possibility of comparing differences in understanding friendships between
children
of different ages or opposite sex. The applied generalization significantly contributed to the development of understanding of
friendship
between
children
.
However
, its limitation was strictly subordinating the characteristics of
friendship
to predetermined coding.
Such
a solution excluded the inclusion of
friendship
traits indicated by the
children
in the
essay
if their reasoning did not fit into categories created by the
researchers
. In view of the above, I suspect that the method could have contributed to affecting
research
findings by confirmatory bias.
Furthermore
, the transformation of qualitative into quantitative data likely caused the loss in the understanding of
Correct article usage
the individual
show examples
individual
Correct article usage
the individual
show examples
and personal dimensions
Change preposition
of
show examples
on
Change preposition
of
show examples
the studied
children
.
Submitted by kaitlanmorris on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: