In many countries around the world, rural people are moving to cities, so the population in the countryside is decreasing. Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?

People

in the countryside have started to migrate to modern and big cities.

This

is believed to be

due to

a modernization process of the world and its general society. It is argued that

this

occurrence is considered an

overall

positive development. To support

this

argument, the impacts of industrialization and the benefits of a more advanced

education

system will be analyzed

further

through

this

essay.

Firstly

, owing to the advancements made in the industry sector, the proportion of the population needed to work in rural areas is continuously decreasing.

For instance

, nowadays, machines like tractors and automated mills could easily overtake the labour that used to be done by farmers, which resulted in less need for human resources.

Consequently

, most of the work in the countryside could be done easily by only a few

people

,

while

the rest could enhance their skills in the cities.

This

negates the argument that fewer

people

in the countryside could cause a net negative outcome.

Furthermore

, for a country to excel globally, there needs to be a properly designed

education

system, which can only be accessed in bigger, more modern cities.

For example

, in Indonesia, the top 10 best educational institutions are heavily saturated in DKI Jakarta, the capital region of Indonesia. The movement of families from rural to urban areas could enable the younger generations to access far more advanced levels of quality

education

, preparing them to be able to strive in the globalization era.

To conclude

, owing to better access to quality

education

and the ease of burden by machinery automatization, the migration of

people

from rural to urban settings will provide more positive takeaways than negative ones, as the world will continuously adapt to a more modern outlook in the future.