Science will soon make people live up to 100 or even 200 years. Some believe ‎Itis a good thing while others disagree. Discuss both views, and give your own ‎opinion.‎

Science plays an important role in making

people

immortal. While some think that it is considered valuable because it will increase the survival rate of human being, others argue that. In my opinion, education will definitely ensure

people

would live more than 200 years and it will bring positivity to society.

To begin

with, consider the

people

who support the concept that

people

would survive up to 100 years or more than that due to science because of advancement in medical facilities.

In other words

, various kinds of vaccines and medications are available in the market, which secures

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

individuals from any vulnerable diseases.

for instance

, a recent article in the newspaper cleared that the mortality estimate of the developing countries declined by 60% as compared with the past data.

This

can be done by the advancement in medical treatment.

Thus

, the technique will raise the lifespan of the human on earth.

On the contrary

, there are some

people

who disagree with the thought that if

people

start living more than their average life,

then

it will be a disaster for the human race. As more resources will be needed by

humans

and

this

would become a threat to the government as well as the environment. A recent theory,

for example

, revealed that nature needs a healthy food chain so that every species plays its role for a specific period of time. Any disturbance with it

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

will put the life of another species in danger.

Therefore

, there should be limits on the survival rate of

humans

on the earth. In conclusion, in my opinion, the system will enhance the life expectancy rate of the

people

and

this

beneficial for

humans

too. When

humans

do not die on time.

However

,

this

could disturb the food chain of nature.