International tourism has brought enormous benefit to many places. At the same time, there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment. Do the disadvantages of international tourism outweigh the advantages?

Due to providing support for the

people

in need around the world,

organizations

have been modified to handle the situation in different countries. There has been a controversy about whether these

organizations

should prioritize their own citizens or individuals in more necessity for receiving help not necessary from their own country. Both views will be discussed in

this

essay. Not to mention that I believe these

organizations

should put the

people

in more critical situations

first

without concerning their nationality. Charity

organizations

around the world get their financial support for their effort from either the government or their own

people

through taxes or volunteer payments.

Therefore

se financial supports eveeventuallyould be considered the right of their own citizens. It has become a common belief that these charities should

first

address the problem of their own

people

.

For instance

, when a country like Iran has a restricted budget to tackle the critical situations that might encounter, like natural disasters

such

as floods and earthquakes, it would sound more reasonable to designate the charity amount for its own

people

. By looking closer at the problems for the

people

living in developed and developing countries, the huge difference in the quality of life had led to the obvious difference in the degree of their emergency for help. To illustrate it much better, during the pandemic every country had to deal with the spread of Coronavirus among

people

but the degree of the problem was varied. In ,Iran there was scarce vaccination available. Not to mention that because of sanction there was not enough drug to cure either.

People

need to work to put food on their table.

In contrast

, in ,Canada there was abundant vaccination. Some

people

would deliberately refuse to take their shots.

people

would receive financial support from the government to stay home safe. Since the emergency to tackle problems in some areas is far more critical, it could be said that it is logical to prioritize according to the degree of the issue encountered. In conclusion,

although

some

people

have the right to presume that it is better for charity

organizations

to prefer their own citizens rather than the

people

more in need around the world. But I am inclined totally to the opposite view. There should be an assessment to see which issue is more critical to handle

first

.