A certain community
beliveVerb problem
show examples
that the most efficient way to improve
health
is to increase the amount of
health
facilities.
OtheCorrect your spelling
show examples
people
,
on the other hand
, think that
strategy would have close to no effect on
overall
health
and that we should
different measures. In
this
essay,
iChange the capitalization
show examples
will discuss both of these opinions and give my own point of view.
The
people
that
beliveCorrect your spelling
show examples
in increasing the number of hospitals, doctors offices or even dentists might be correct. In their point of view, more of these places would mean that more
people
would be able to get treated in a
shortedReplace the word
show examples
amount of time.
This
would be beneficial as a dentistry office nowadays can be completely booked for more than a month, forcing clients to call at least a few weeks ahead of the moment they want their appointment.
This
results often in
people
or giving up on going and staying with their bad tooth for longer than it is recommended.
This
,
overall
, could lead to serious
health
problems
for many
people
in the long run.
However
,
this
strategy would cost billions of dollars to all
governmentFix the agreement mistake
show examples
around the world as building hospitals is a very expensive process.
On the other hand
, different
people
say that the best solution is
different. Maybe
government
regulations, for
, increasing the taxes on cigarettes in order to force
the Correct article usage
show examples
people
out of the habit and reduce the number of lung cancer in general. There could
also
be similar regulations on unhealthy foods, resulting in lower rates of heart diseases or cardiovascular
problems
.
This
strategy,
in addition
to all the
health
benefits, would
also
bring in a lot of tax
money
for the
government
to invest in other public sectors,
such
as education or the circulation system.
An alternative solution may be for
the Correct article usage
show examples
people
to
Add a missing verb
show examples
themselves and for them to willingly take care of their
health
by eating better, doing more sports and having healthier habits.
This
would have the same public
health
benefits as the previous option but will
also
take a lot of stress off of the public healthcare system.
In my opinion, the
second
group of
people
are the more sensible ones, the
first
option would help save lives and hundreds of thousands of dollars,
also
bringing in lots of
money
from taxes that could be invested anywhere. As for the
second
option, it is time for
the Correct article usage
show examples
people
to realise the
stress that presses upon the different healthcare systems around the world. I
beliveCorrect your spelling
show examples
that
people
should indeed have better habits in
liveReplace the word
show examples
, in order to help themselves and
otherFix the agreement mistake
show examples
.
I personally disagree with the
first
opinion as it would be extremely expensive and does not consist of helping the
people
get healthier and resposabilizing them, but
instead
consistCorrect subject-verb agreement
show examples
inChange preposition
show examples
spending billions of dollars to treat them and give
money
away to the big pharma groups.
In summary, the
first
opinion for me is not the most appropriate as it only is about treating
problems
that could be avoided, all
this
at a really high cost
in addition
to that.
While
, the
second
of view is all about helping
the Correct article usage
show examples
people
not get any
health
problems
in the
first
place, all
while
earning
money
for the
government
.
Thus
,
iChange the capitalization
show examples
stand with the
second
group of
people
.