Today, newspapers and televisions are giving detailed descriptions on crimes. Some people believe such a practice will cause bad consequences and thus media should be restricted. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Social media are invading our lives and influencing our thought and decisions. Part of the
audience
trust that bad news spreading widely and rapidly through televisions and newspapers are negatively affecting them and those media must be restricted.
This
essay will discuss why I slightly disagree with
this
point of view and trust that many proposals can decrease the negative impact without restricting those tools. Reading or hearing crime news is becoming our daily routine. Unfortunately, those news is increasing dramatically and social media are posting them without editing or filtering,
thus
showing unsuitable videos for the
audience
.
This
practice will definitely have a negative impact on viewers. While some people may have insomnia, others may face mental disruption or maybe it will drive them to suicide.
Consequently
, the behaviour of these social media must be controlled to lower these negative impacts. Restricting social media's job is not quite the proper action to solve
this
problem. We all need to stay up to date with everything happening around us. Whereas newspapers and televisions are our fastest way to retrieve news, banning them will disconnect us from the surrounding. Rather than restricting those media tools, implementing filtering restriction on crime or violence news will not harm
audience
's thoughts and feeling,
thus
will decrease negative impacts on their life. In conclusion the solution is to restrict some of the criminal details not to restrict the whole media coverage or work. Bad news is invading social media on a daily basis.
This
essay discussed why delivering all the details by newspapers and television may disturb the
audience
and cause negative consequences. In my opinion, while I slightly agree with that point of view, I still think a better solution would be to filter and approve any news before delivering it to all people.
Submitted by Nada Rizk on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: