People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems. Give your opinion.
Many
people
state that to deal with environmental issues, government sh
ould raise Add an article
the government
fuel
pri
ce fo
r cars and other Fix the agreement mistake
prices
vehicles
. I totally agree with this
statement for the following reasons.
Firstly
, if authority raises taxes on petrol, this
would be able to reduce the density of means of transportation. To be more specific, the number of cars for journeys will be constrained, which helps to cut down emission, a
detrimental factor contributing to greFix the agreement mistake
emissions
enhouse ef
fect. Statistics show that the figure of Add an article
the greenhouse
ve
hicles for long journeys has declined significantly by 20% since the Change preposition
for
fuel
cost climbed that improves the air quality considerably in recent years. Another point to consider is that this
rising in fuel
price
can provide the incentive for alternative fuel
. In more details,
Fix the agreement mistake
detail
people
are encouraged to use fuel
based on waste products such
as vegetable oil or corn-based ethanol. Research show th
at using these environment-friendly fuels can decrease a lChange the verb form
shows
a
rge amount of carbon dioxide relCorrect article usage
the
easing to
Wrong verb form
released
th
e environment. Change preposition
into
Therefore
, increase in
the Correct article usage
an increase
price
of fuel
can limit environmental problems.
Despite these, many people
still claim that government can raise citizen’s aw
areness of some Fix the agreement mistake
citizens’
fue
l efficient ve
hicle types Add a hyphen
fuel-efficient
instead
of increasing the fuel
cost. They may believe that these means of transportation have smart op
eAdd an article
a smart
the smart
ration to
help economize petrol and decrease the amount of exhausted gas. To Fix the agreement mistake
operations
this
, I will argue that fuel
-saving vehicles
may not be a perfect solution because of customer unaffordability. Specifically, it is excessive fi
nancial cost for conAdd an article
an excessive
Add an article
a consumer
sumer to
purchase Fix the agreement mistake
consumers
this
product. In my opinion, upgrading the infrastructure of transportation is considered to be an effective way. In other words
, a good transport system can drop traffic jam wh
ich produces a vast amount of exhFix the agreement mistake
jams
austed fu
mes causing air pollution. Clearly, impReplace the word
exhausting
rovement tr
aCorrect article usage
an improvement
ffic st
ructure is necessary for solving environmental issues.
In conclusion, there areChange preposition
of traffic
a
wide range of solutions to help cope with traffic and pollution problems. Change the verb form
is
However
, a substantial increase in fuel
price
would be a useful method for environment. I
t can not only help to reduce the crowd of Correct article usage
the environment
vehicles
, but also
encourage people
to use friendly fuel
.Submitted by Andy on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.