There seems to be an increasing number of serious crimes committed each year. While some think the best way is to use the death penalty as a deterrent, many people believe that other measures will be needed. Discuss both sides.

In the contemporary era, the crimes rate has been increased every year

this

topic is debatable whether the best way to punish criminals is either the

death

penalty

or other measures that will need.

This

essay will discuss both arguments why other criteria will be required.

To begin

with, it is argued by some populations that Offenders need to be punished

Death

as a deterrent since they want their society and communities

people

safe as many severe crimes have been done by criminals

for example

, according to, ABC news crime rate has increased by 40% as compared before year's even offenders do not afraid to do the murder of someone

as a result

, several

people

have options that If they should get the

death

punishment

then

people

could be safe and secure.

Furthermore

,

instead

of giving the

death

penalty

, there are various other measures available to give punishment to culprits. Primarily, if a person does small wrongdoing

then

the detriment should be minor as well.

For instance

, if an individual snatch bag, money, phone, necklace so on

then

a fine should not be

death

rather than

this

they should be charged for taking money or giving warning them as an outcome that individual would be watchful

next

time.

In other words

, crime can be either small or huge it should be punished according to the offence.

Hence

, the community believe to take other measures rather than the

death

penalty

. In conclusion, even though it is considered by some

people

that criminals should be penalized as the

death

penalty

while others acknowledge if the crime is small

then

punishment should be slight they

also

permit an opportunity to be a better person in the community.