Many people advocate higher status academic holders should do jobs in domestic countries,
while
others claim that they have freedom in accordance with what they want or wish for. Linking Words
This
essay will discuss both points of view and argue in favour of the latter.
On the one hand, when professionals Linking Words
such
as doctors, engineers, pilots, and other skilled workers are prohibited to migrate to other territories, Linking Words
then
there will be sufficient human resources within a country. Linking Words
For instance
, every year, the majority of the Nepalese inhabitants who are skilled and qualified tend to leave their land and settle in other developed countries where they meet their requirements. Linking Words
As a result
, there is a shortage or lack of human resources in their own land. They are not deprived of moving into a foreign realm. Linking Words
In addition
, the government might have to suffer from highly skilled manpower, which will slow down the pace of development in various sectors.
Linking Words
On the other hand
, it takes time, money, and dedication to gain top academic knowledge.There is a lot of sacrifice that an individual goes through to be successful in his life. Linking Words
In other words
, they tend to work hard to get their desired outcome. Linking Words
Moreover
, it is a human right to have the freedom of making choices in their life. So, nobody should be underprivileged to work in another state where there is an increased possibility of career growth. In my opinion, I believe that Linking Words
instead
of depriving their rights, they must have their own choice whether to work there or to move abroad.
In conclusion, the issue of expert labourers in a particular territory might be solved. Linking Words
However
, I believe that it will be against fundamental freedom if we do not free them.Linking Words
suneel22.sn