It is important to consider whether to give
to pupils or not by their educators.
essay discusses both sides of the argument and
give my own perspective on
On one side of the argument, there are people who argue that
should not be given to
children by their teachers. The main reason for believing
is that children could use their time-after-
in leisure activities. Since
spare-time activities are vital in youngsters' developments, both physical and mental, it is essential to provide them with the opportunities to engage in sports or other fruitful activities to freshen up their minds and bodies.
, according to a survey conducted by NewYork's
Association, pupils who are not given
, tend to utilize their time by engaging in sports activities, and usually appear to be more active than other schools' students.
On the other hand
, it is often argued that
has an effective contribution in youngsters' education.
is because small assignments or tasks to be done after
, often keep students engaged and occupied,
helping them in developing their cognitive skills which is useful for them in their educational
, students who spend their time at home in completing
are usually more productive and achieve remarkable grades in their exams. A
point is that
pupils tend to develop the habit of hard work in the form of studying at home
, other than
makes them strong and prepare them for the struggle later on in their professional
In conclusion, I believe both sides have their merits. On balance, I tend to believe that
, surely, is beneficial for a student's academic
as it provides him with the benefits of developing cognitive abilities as well as the tendency to face hardships in upcoming