Some people feel that the design of newly constructed buildings in big cities should be controlled by governments. Others believe those who finance the construction of a building should be free to design it as they see fit. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

A highly controversial issue relates to whether the authorities should regulate the

design

of recently built buildings in enormous cities or not. In

this

essay, I am going to examine

this

question from both points of view

andd

in order to; used instead of "to", especially after try, come, go

and

then

provide my own opinion on the matter. On one side of the argument, there are people who argue that the benefits of controlling the scheme of lately erected constructions considerably outweigh its disadvantages. The main reason for

this

belief is that the governments could maintain safety for people using the buildings. It is

also

possible to say that the

design

of recent constructions must meet some safety standards so that they will not cause dangers to their users in the future.

For instance

, there are earthquakes frequently occurring frequently in Taiwan.

Hence

, its government compels most of the buildings to meet some standards to be sustainable to earthquakes.

On the other hand

, it is

also

possible to make the opposing case. It is often argued that people who invest in the buildings should have rights to

design

them according to their preferences. People often hold

this

notion because there will be a wide variety of amazing constructions if the designers feel free to be creative in designing the structures.

In other words

, being free to decide on the

design

of the buildings, designers may create extraordinary erections which will contribute to

architectural diversity

Suggestion

the architectural diversity

of a country. To illustrate, Landmark 81 has become the tallest building in Vietnam with an amazing

design

due to the permission of creativity. In conclusion, I believe both arguments have their strong points. On balance,

however

, I suppose that the

design

of new constructions should be regulated by the governments because all of the buildings should be guaranteed to be safe in use.