Some people believe that it is good to share as much as information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Some people would argue that sharing as much as

information

as possible in the realms of science, business and the academia

is

Suggestion

are

advisable, while others would contend that certain

information

is too crucial or too valuable to be exchanged freely.

Although

sharing as much as much knowledge is a fundamental right of every citizen at large, I believe that military

information

must be kept confidential, and

thus

it should not be shared

to

Suggestion

with

the public freely. On the one hand, all individuals have the right to retrieve and learn as much as they can from scientific studies, business and

epistemic

community. In essence,

information

from these areas is considered as a public good and the very purpose of studying and yielding these

information

is to educate the public and ensure healthy societies.

For instance

, if the

information

regarding the Covid-19 vaccine is held to strictly a small group of people, hundreds and thousands of the world population would be left untreated

, resulting millions

Suggestion

, resulting in millions

of

fatal

of or relating to a fetus

fetal

deaths.

Likewise

, companies are obliged to release their financial transactions so that not just their shareholders, but all consumers would be well-informed with the ethics of the companies. It is incontrovertible that individuals retain their claim to have an access to the

information

,

however

, I argue that it is not morally advisable for individuals to retrieve certain

information

that can jeopardise a country's security.

On the other hand

, some

information

such

as the national security data must be restricted to the public as once when it is leaked, it may potentially cause social upheavals or even erupt wars. It is unfathomable for

nuclear states

Suggestion

the nuclear states

to release their coordinate on nuclear arsenals.

For instance

, if the US government tirelessly updates the

information

on its nuclear weapons to the public, other hostile actors

such

as North Korea or terrorist groups may attack or steal the US' nuclear weapons.

As a result

, the attacks may wreak havoc on the US soil, annihilating the entire US population. The potential outcome of releasing

such

highly-classified

information

is catastrophic, I argue that military

information

must be kept out of

public's eye

Suggestion

the public's eye

. In conclusion,

this

essay disputed that despite our fundamental right to know as much as we can from academic research and business, the nature of some

information

such

as national security is utterly valuable and

thus

, required to be kept confidential to the public.