It is too expensive to look after and repair old buildings. This money should be spent on building modern buildings instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The cost inquired in maintaining old structures is very high;

instead

, the fund should be utilized in erecting new ones, and I completely agree with

this

stance.

To begin

with, the return on investment for old

buildings

diminishes over time;

hence

, the value of the money spent on maintaining them does not always match the benefits that comes with it.

For instance

, it is known that people will prefer new

buildings

, which usually have modern facilities and are located in serein environment. Unfortunately, spending more resources on ancient

buildings

limits access to the benefits that come with building modern homes.

Thus

, it is more efficient to spend money on erecting modern structures rather than old ones. More so, it is challenging to access materials needed to look after ancient edifices since most of these kinds of stuff are out of date and not in the market any more. It is a known fact that some part of ancient

buildings

are not replaceable and, even when available, are extremely expensive or non-attractive to the new world. Sadly, efforts to make these pieces of stuff available still do not attract the desired outcomes as they will be viewed as out of fashion.

Therefore

, investing in erecting contemporary homes will save time and efforts put into looking for unavailable or out of fashion things. In summary, the successful renovation of aged edifice comes with the high cost and the challenges of finding a replacement for things required to achieve

this

task.

Hence

, channelling available resources to constructing contemporary

buildings

will save cost as well as energy and time.

Therefore

, It is a worth-while decision to construct modern edifices

instead

of renovating old ones.