One of the best ways to solve environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree.

With agreeable to the order of the day, people, nowadays, are buying and using more
cars
in order to lead an epicurean life, creating many problems for the natural environment.
Consequently
, there has been a growing body of opinion in favour of increasing the
price
of
fuel
for
cars
and other transport so as to solve environmental issues. Being a rational mind,
however
, take issue with
this
notion, for I am of the view that
this
step will escalate the
food
production and will have no impact on opulent people’s lifestyle. Among the ratiocination to buttress my stance, the one that deals with the significance of raising the
fuel
cost
as a way to stabilize the
price
of foods.
In other words
, if governments increase the
cost
of
fuel
for vehicles, the transportation
cost
of the
food
supply rises simultaneously, causing to go up the
price
of foodstuff that may be a burden for the general public. To cite an example, in 2009 when the government of Singapore increased the
price
of
fuel
to control traffic and contain air pollution, the citizens had to cut the chosen
food
items from their lists because of high
price
, causing dissatisfaction towards the government.
Hence
, inasmuch as the increasing
price
of
fuel
would lead to raising the
price
of general
food
,
this
approach should not be applied. Another critical rationale in reference to why governments ought not to increase the
fuel
cost
is necessarily synonymous with not having any impact on rich people who have
cars
. To be more precise, if an individual had the ability to purchase and maintain a vehicle, he or she would be able to pay the increased
fuel
price
with a view to maintaining his social status. To exemplify, an empirical study conducted by Oxford University reveals that 95% of car owners are ready to cut their budget from other sides, but they are not willing to leave their
cars
.
Therefore
, the step of rising the
fuel
cost
would have no effect on car owners’ attitudes as well as on the environment. In conclusion insofar as increasing
fuel
costs for vehicles would lead to increasing the
price
of foods and would not motivate rich people,
this
policy cannot solve environmental issues.
Submitted by shawlin90 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: