Some believe that nuclear weapons benefit the world at large. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There are a number of people who would argue that nuclear

weapons

have more benefits overall for the

world

.

However

, I completely disagree with the statement. In my opinion storage of nuclear

weapons

are costly and difficult;

furthermore

, these

weapons

are a constant threat to

world

safety. The reason I completely disagree with the aforementioned statement is related to the storage and maintenance of nuclear

weapons

. To elaborate, nuclear

weapons

required intensive attention because of their radioactive rays which are dangerous for all living things.

Therefore

, not all countries have those facilities and protocols which are required to ensure safe environments around nuclear

weapons

.

Thus

, there are no benefits for spending a lot of budget and time to look after nuclear

weapons

, which could harm any living thing.

For example

, Chernobyl nuclear incident was a complete disaster in terms of economically and human life.

Furthermore

, nuclear

weapons

are a constant threat to all living things.

In other words

, a small conflict between two countries that owns nuclear

weapons

could ignite a nuclear war.

Therefore

, nuclear

weapons

have enough power to annihilate the

world

in hours and leave total destruction.

For instance

, two cities Nagasaki and Hiroshima who were victims of nuclear attacks during

World

War 2 still have negative health effects on people who are living there.

Hence

, Nuclear

weapons

are the tools of mass destruction. In conclusion, I totally disagree that nuclear

weapons

benefit the

world

more. In my opinion, these

weapons

are a waste of money and time and required a lot country's budget;

moreover

, a nuclear weapon holds a potential threat to all humans.