Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Spending the budget on public transportation rather than
roads
is a better alternative for governments.In my opinion, both
roads
and railways have their own usages and neither should be put aside by the government as they are equally vital. Primarily, public transportation is better for the environment as less gas is used and will result in less air pollution, Rails are
also
faster for commuters and make it possible for citizens to reside in one city and work in another one without having to suffer from traffic and lack of parking lots.generally speaking, if city regions have a decent railway
then
overall livability and convenience is improved.
for instance
my parents live in Malmo and thanks to the great train system they are able to work in Copenhagen, which by the way is another city. While it is true that spending money on public transportation comes with many upsides, shifting our attention from
Roads
is neither reasonable nor fair, as many people use their personal vehicles as their main transport means. So it is supremely important to maintain
roads
. Not to mention that modern cities are built for cars and taking all money from
roads
can lead to horrendous outcomes
such
as an increased risk of car crashes, poor lightening system and presence of bumps on the
roads
.Do you think that people who pay taxes deserve to suffer from poor-quality
roads
? In conclusion, we need to accept with an open mind that while improving railways have great advantages, Government's focus must still be on
roads
as well because many people require
roads
to commute.
Submitted by atizv555 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • Carbon emissions
  • Mass transportation
  • Traffic congestion
  • Economic growth
  • Regional development
  • Initial investment
  • Feasibility
  • Flexibility
  • Rural areas
  • Integration
  • Sustainable
  • Efficiency
  • Infrastructure
  • Commuters
  • Public expenditure
  • Autonomous vehicles
  • Long-term investment
  • Accessibility
  • Connectivity
  • Modal shift
What to do next:
Look at other essays: