Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Spending the budget on public transportation rather than

roads

Use synonyms

is a better alternative for governments.In my opinion, both

roads

Use synonyms

and railways have their own usages and neither should be put aside by the government as they are equally vital. Primarily, public transportation is better for the environment as less gas is used and will result in less air pollution, Rails are

also

Linking Words

faster for commuters and make it possible for citizens to reside in one city and work in another one without having to suffer from traffic and lack of parking lots.generally speaking, if city regions have a decent railway

then

Linking Words

overall livability and convenience is improved.

for instance

Linking Words

my parents live in Malmo and thanks to the great train system they are able to work in Copenhagen, which by the way is another city. While it is true that spending money on public transportation comes with many upsides, shifting our attention from

Roads

Use synonyms

is neither reasonable nor fair, as many people use their personal vehicles as their main transport means. So it is supremely important to maintain

roads

Use synonyms

. Not to mention that modern cities are built for cars and taking all money from

roads

Use synonyms

can lead to horrendous outcomes

such

Linking Words

as an increased risk of car crashes, poor lightening system and presence of bumps on the

roads

Use synonyms

.Do you think that people who pay taxes deserve to suffer from poor-quality

roads

Use synonyms

? In conclusion, we need to accept with an open mind that while improving railways have great advantages, Government's focus must still be on

roads

Use synonyms

as well because many people require

roads

Use synonyms

to commute.