It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. What are advantages and disadvantages of this development? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. You should write at least 250 words.

It is aforementioned that in the current days flying to spots that are hard to reach becomes achievable.
Nevertheless
,
this
has positive and negative. Both sides will be highlighted in the following lines. To commence with, the supporters of the former viewpoint argue that discovering modern places is spectacular due to the fact that it might enhance life. To elaborate more, new animals and plants might be found there as well.
Hence
, scientists will have an opportunity to educate themselves about them.
Therefore
, a cure for certain diseases could be found.
Accordingly
, life will have higher quality. Despite the previous fact, a non-known area has the potential to live in it.
Therefore
, crowded cities might have space.
Thus
, the amount of CO2 will be diminished, which will affect positively the global climate.
On the other hand
, the other holders think it is not a wise decision to travel to remote places on an account of it might be hazardous. To contribute more, these new locations might be a harbour for deadly creatures.
Consequently
, it is risky to land there without any former knowledge. As an illustration, considering the area where I live. in a new location, a plant that has harmful poison was found. To conclude, areas that are recently possible to fly to, have pros and cons. Based on the above-mentioned, I think it does not worth taking risks and landing in these spots.
Submitted by 2018161085.rus on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Essentional vocabulary list for IELTS Writing 7+

Learn how to write high-scoring essays with powerful words.
Download Free PDF and start improving you writing skills today!
Topic Vocabulary:
  • remote natural environment
  • scientific research
  • climate change
  • environmental preservation
  • economic benefits
  • conservation efforts
  • habitat disruption
  • pollution
  • cultural disruption
  • indigenous populations
  • commercialization
  • safety risks
  • personal enrichment
  • ecosystems
  • awareness
  • appreciation for nature
What to do next:
Look at other essays: