Some people believe that restoration of old building costs too much. We should demolish them and build new one instead. Do you agree or disagree?

Renovation is a responsible way of using resources because it involves the preservation of what we have already built. Of course, rebuilding can sometimes be expensive. Still, it is better than building altogether new structures. Restoration

also

helps preserve our heritage. Old properties often

has

Change the verb form

have

show examples

a story to tell. They are windows to the past. When we restore a building, we are preserving our heritage and a part of our history. The major cost involved in restoration is the cost of labour and

that is

the best thing about it. Restoration creates jobs and improves the local economy without

further

depleting our natural resources. Building a new house requires a lot of materials including wood, bricks, steel, cement and sand. When new

equity

mushrooms in cities and towns, we lose forests. Sand mining has caused the death of many a river. When sand beds disappear rivers lose their ability to retain water. And when rivers dry out, water scarcity occurs.

This

can lead to the loss of crops and cattle and has become quite an issue in many countries. What’s more, when new

equity

is built after demolishing old

equity

, we need to dispose of the cement and concrete. Failure to do so will lead to a major environmental issue. Of course, some

equity

cannot be restored.

Also

in cities where space is an

issue

Add a comma

,issue

show examples

there is a need to demolish old and dilapidated structures and create new high-rises.

This

is necessary to provide housing to a large number of people. Rehabilitation is not advisable in

this

case. In conclusion, revival can be expensive but it must be promoted because it does not leave a negative impact on the environment. Building new structures should be permitted only in cases where rehabilitation is not possible.