Some people think human behavior can be limited by the law, while others think the law has little effect. What is your opinion?

The idea that human

behaviour

can be limited by the

law

, which lies among arguable debates, has again sparked controversy. Some proponents agree with

this

state, while opponents claim that the

law

has little effect.

This

essay will elaborate

both

Change preposition

on both

show examples

sides of the debate

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

and

thus

lead to a final conclusion.

To begin

with, there are numerous reasons why the

law

can limit human

behaviour

.

However

, the most evident one derives from the fact that people often tend to limit their bad actions because they fear serious punishment from the

law

. An instance illustrating

this

idea is that people who know the negative consequences of murder would never want to become a murderer because they are scared of the death penalty or life imprisonment.

Furthermore

, the absence of laws gives freedom to do according to everyone’s choice and leads to a dangerous society. Moving on to consider the opposing arguments put forward by critics, some people believe that the influence of

law

on human

behaviour

is not significant. It is largely attributed to the fact that if one is not properly educated on how to be a prosperous member of society, there would be no guarantee he would behave well and inhibits any wrongdoings.

For instance

, drivers are being fined by the police more and more on a regular basis, which has no tangible effect on reducing the rate of road accidents.

Additionally

, disobeying

against

Change preposition

apply

show examples

the

law

might increase the consequences of criminal

law

In conclusion, while there are strong arguments on both sides of the debate, a final conclusion must be drawn, and I strongly believe that societies should have a

law

to limit people’s bad

behaviour

.