goverments should spend money on railways rather than roads. do you agree or disagree?

It has been suggested that governments have to expend more money on railways rather than roads. I agree with

this

statement to a large extent due to reaching the destination more quickly and having more capacity for people and goods. Some people believe that not only do the trains are not suitable as a transportation system , but

also

they have a negative impact on the air condition .

However

, I refuse to think that road transportation

such

as cars and trucks are already polluting the air by emitting toxic gases into the fresh air .

For example

, often they will be converted to some disease and allergies in folks

such

as asthma . Another reason is that if someone orders or buys some products from another city , they will be arrived by train sooner than a lorry .

Also

, it has a more reasonable cost because lorries and trucks should stay in traffic . so , the drivers are forced to spend the majority of their money on their car's petrol .

In addition

, railway transportations are more spacious than road vehicles . so , they have a large capacity to move various sizes of goods and different numbers of people .

Furthermore

, rail vehicles are able to move to another city easily by fast driving because there is no barrier to stop them. To conclude , there are some beneficial aspects to spending money on railway transportation .

For instance

, lower production of dangerous gases causes health problems and lower prices than road vehicles . so , if I want to give a bit of advice , I should say governments are responsible to pay more attention to trains and subways , they

also

have to make an exact plan to enhance and construct more rails for public utilities.

Submitted by anitashayegan1383 on Wed Nov 23 2022

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

Paragraph 1 - Introduction

Sentence 1 - Background statement
Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
Sentence 3 - Thesis
Sentence 4 - Outline sentence

Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph

Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
Sentence 2 - Example
Sentence 3 - Discussion
Sentence 4 - Conclusion

Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph

Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
Sentence 2 - Example
Sentence 3 - Discussion
Sentence 4 - Conclusion

Paragraph 4 - Conclusion

Sentence 1 - Summary
Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Do you want to check your IELTS essays?

Submit unlimited essays, letters and charts. Sign up right now and start improving your writing skills.

8Linking words
meeting the goal of 7 or more
0Word repetition
meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
0Grammar mistakes
 

4 paragraphs

307 words

0123456789.0505

Overall Band Score

Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0

Logical structure

Introduction & conclusion present

Supported main points

Accurate linking words

Variety in linking words

Lexical resource: 9.0

Varied vocabulary

Accurate spelling & word formation

Grammatical Range: 9.0

Mix of complex & simple sentences

Clear and correct grammar

Task Achievement: 6.0

Complete response

6.5

Clear & comprehensive ideas

Relevant & specific examples

Appropriate word count

🚀 Prepare for IELTS writing section today!

Unlimited Task 1 checks
Get all the feedback you need to keep improving your charts and letters.
Unlimited Task 2 checks
Practice and perfect your skills with essays.
Personalized suggestions
Know how to boost your score.
Detailed mistakes analysis
Get instant feedback. Spot every mistake.
Topic ideas generator
Get topic-specific ideas to enhance your writing.
Vocabulary helper
Get the right words for any topic.
Progress tracking
Track your writing improvements.

What to do next:

Look at other essays:

7
band
you recently attended a meeting at a hotel. When you return home, you found you had left some important papers at the hotel. Write a letter to the manager of the hotel. In your letter: * say where you think you left the papers * explain why they are so important * tell the manager what you want him/her to do
I am writing this letter to inform you about my left out Important paper at your hotel.
7.5
band
Many old buildings are protected by laws because they are part of a nation's history. However, some people think they should be knocked down to make way for new ones because people need houses and offices. How important is it to maintain old buildings? Should history stand in the way of progress?
There are controversial perspectives heating debate over old buildings together with progress. While some claim that it is necessary to preserve ancient construction, the opposite makes a statement that history should not hold back the way of progress. Whilst each has its own perks, I would contend that it is optimal to combine both mentioned factors.
5
band
Test 17: Governments should focus their spending on public services rather than on the art (e.g. Music and painting). To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people assert that it is more advisable for the authorities to invest in public services instead of art. Owing to the social well-being and the current inclination of residents’ needs, this writer totally agree with this statement and will explain it in the following sections.
5
band
Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?
Most museums require a entrance fee while the rest are free.I believe that this generates income to the survival of these places, and gives a value to the history and generate foreign revenue to a country. However , the unaffordability for the poorer is the major drawback of the above. Yet , I think benifits of taking a fee from entrees outweight the drawbacks of it.
7
band
Public transport is essential but problematic. Describe some of problems connected to public transport and suggest some solutions.
In the millennial era, conventional vehicles still play an important role in society, although their existence is debatable. The main agenda of the impending composition is to elaborate on various drawbacks in the community and a myriad of ideas, which individuals and the government could certainly apply.

goverments should spend money on railways rather than roads. do you agree or disagree?

Fully explain your ideas

Many old buildings are protected by laws because they are part of a nation's history. However, some people think they should be knocked down to make way for new ones because people need houses and offices. How important is it to maintain old buildings? Should history stand in the way of progress?

Test 17: Governments should focus their spending on public services rather than on the art (e.g. Music and painting). To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?

Public transport is essential but problematic. Describe some of problems connected to public transport and suggest some solutions.