Some people think that current environmental issues are global problems and should therefore be dealt with by the government while others believe that these problems can only be tackled by individuals. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

Some
people
would argue that present environmental
problems
are global and should be solved by the
government
while others consider that naturally related
issues
could only be solved by
people
. Solving ecological
problems
by local citizens is a good solution due to residents' interest in tackling environmental disasters,
however
, I think that
this
problem is able to be solved only by
government
Add an article
the government
show examples
because they could provide a lot of funding for that. On the one hand, solving natural
problems
by identities is a good and quick solution.
In other words
,
people
are interested in it because these
issues
make them suffer,
for example
, from poor air quality or global warming, which have negative on their lives.
Moreover
, if all local citizens contributed to solving the problem, it would be quicker, rather than using another method.
For example
, in Pakistan was a high level of air pollution due to the heavy industry of medicine but almost all residents took part in order to close manufactures. Despite the fact that tackling these
problems
by
people
is a relevant and quick solution, my perspective is that it might not solve
problems
rigorously.
On the other hand
, only
government
is able to provide
a vast amounts
Correct the article-noun agreement
a vast amount
vast amounts
show examples
of money to solve these
issues
forever. By funding for tackling
issues
. the
government
gives a golden opportunity to deal with
issues
rigorously. As an example, the top countries with the best ecological conditions are countries, which donate a lot of money to solve ecological
issues
such
as Germany and other European countries. My opinion is that if
only
Add an article
the only
show examples
government
takes part in solving natural
issues
,
issues
will be solved rigorously. In conclusion, while solving problem by identities is quick, tackling the same
problems
by the
government
is a much more relevant approach.
Submitted by prostoy.pacan4ek on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: