Maintaining public libraries is a waste of time since computer technology is now replacing their functions. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Technology has now

such

a big role in our life. Someone thinks that keeping public libraries open is a waste of time and money because a computer can easily replace them in its functions. I will discuss

this

topic highlighting why libraries are important not only because of storing and offering books but

also

for their pivotal social role. It's clear that a computer, or any other digital device, can easily do the function of storing books and offer scans of their pages to clients, but users would read these novels only through a screen which,

firstly

, may not be liked by readers who prefer paper books,

in addition

, can affect your eyes health in a long term compromising your sight.

Furthermore

, these places have another function

besides

the classical one. These places have a social purpose because they offer,

for example

, some courses about literature for free or there are usually a lot of desks where students can study together helping each other and sharing some experience, in fact, I use to study twice a day with my friends in

this

place and I find it very constructive and helps you to make bonds with people stronger. In conclusion,I strongly disagree with the opinion of shutting down all public libraries

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

and using computers

instead

. In my opinion is very important to keep these buildings open because not only they are keepers of our culture but

also

provide some services, as a gathering point, that are essential for our society.