Some people believe more actions can be taken to prevent crime, while others think that little can be done. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.

Crime

is a serious and growing problem in almost all societies over the world, some individuals think that more steps need to be taken to prevent it,

while

others think that it won't have any results, in

this

essay I'll discuss both sides of the argument in details and prove that a plan of action is always vital in order to prevent crimes. On the one hand,

people

who take the view that it's not necessary to put more effort to prevent

crime

are partially true, because governments and authorities have always claimed to fight

crime

but the reality shows that there are no results because the rate of breaking laws has always been the same or even increased.

Moreover

,

people

in charge have always utilised wrong methods and sometimes even provoke

people

to do more crimes,

for instance

, in my city the police have launched a series of slogans in the streets and citizens of the town were suspicious of the efficiency of

this

action, that's why

people

doubt that more actions can prevent

crime

.

On the other hand

, other individuals say that it's wrong to lose hope and that humans have always found a way to deal with their problems and

crime

is not an exception,

for example

, they believe that authorities can hire some experts in human behaviour and with their

help

Add a comma

,help

show examples

we could find an efficient way to minimise crimes. I totally support

this

opinion, I think it's wrong to assume that no matter what actions we take, we will always get the same result, with the advancement of science and technology I believe that at some point we will get a breakthrough that will help us stop

crime

for once and for all.

To conclude

, there are convincing arguments both for and against preventing

crime

;

however

, I believe that the right steps can be taken to tackle

this

problem.