Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

It is often said that financial development is the most important aim for states.

However

,

this

issue is not entirely straightforward, and it is

also

thought that some fields are more crucial than the

economy

.

This

essay will discuss the debate and give a concluding view. On the one hand, those who support economic development claim that

money

is a provider of welfare and other facilities. If a government had enough

money

, they would set up places to serve their folk by using it

such

as nursing homes, schools, and hospitals.

Furthermore

, supporters of the idea promote that the

economy

is evidence of power, especially when it comes to keen competition among

countries

. By,

this

we mean that

money

is a prime weapon for a government to be respected politically.

For example

, the authorities worldwide make an effort to have a good relationship with the United States which is the wealthiest country in the world.

This

demonstrates that financial progress should be a priority for

countries

.

By contrast

, those who oppose the statement highlight that

education

is as crucial as the

economy

for the population. By focusing on only finance to exclusion of

education

, we run the risk of a decrease in scientific development. Without proper

education

, we would fail to raise scientists who have the potential for making inventions, which causes a huge expense for states because they could have to buy science from other

countries

.

For instance

, during the pandemic caused by a subtype of coronavirus, developing

countries

had to spend too much

money

on vaccines

instead

of producing them, causing developed

countries

to make a profit from science. A final point is that healthcare services are

also

a priority for many people in the community

according to

the critics of the debate. If the folk of a place could access health services, they would not make any contribution to the

economy

because they would not focus on their job. In conclusion, I would tend to side with the opponents of the discussion. It seems to be that

education

and healthcare are as significant as finance. It is logical

to conclude

that the authorities should focus on these areas too as much as possible.