Nowadays, people have different views on how medical research should be conducted and tested.
Although
many people support the Linking Words
use
of animal experimentation for developing medicines, I personally believe that animal testing is morally wrong.
On the one hand, there are two main reasons supporting the Use synonyms
use
of Use synonyms
animals
for trial testing. Use synonyms
Firstly
, the verification of new products by a human being is a risky process. Linking Words
Hence
, scientists choose Linking Words
animals
with similar anatomy to humans, and to minimize the suffering they Use synonyms
use
numerous painkillers. Use synonyms
For example
, two years ago, a new polio drug was tested in the countryside of Balochistan on a number of children, resulting in some disabled children. Linking Words
Therefore
, it is a precautionary measure to first test it in something other than humans.
Linking Words
However
, I would strongly agree with those who believe that animal experiments are immoral because research using Linking Words
animals
does not justify the suffering they must endure. If testing is required, there are animal alternatives that can serve the desired purpose. Nowadays, computerized human models are available that give identical results. Use synonyms
In addition
, the reaction of a drug in an animal’s body is quite different from the reaction in a human. Specifically, approximately 90% of medicines that pass tests on Linking Words
animals
fail on people. That’s an enormous waste of money, animal lives, scientific resources and hope.
In conclusion, Use synonyms
although
it is undoubtedly true that animal testing has helped scientists in drug developments and medical discoveries, I believe that the benefits to humans do not justify the pain of Linking Words
animals
. So, researchers should Use synonyms
use
alternative methods to carry out researchUse synonyms
lamminhkhoi2312