In some schools and universities, girls tend to choose arts subjects (e.g., literature, history), and boys tend to choose science subjects (e.g., physics, mathematics). Why do you think this is so? Should this tendency be changed?
#schools #universities #girls #arts #subjects #e #g #literature #history #boys #science #physics #mathematics #tendency
There is a noticeable dissimilarity between girls and boys in choosing majors at universities. More boys participate in scientific majors,
while
more girls prefer art subjects. This
tendency is influenced by the unique biological functions of each gender and outdated societal prejudices. I firmly believe that society can benefit if more girls participate in scientific classes.
To begin
, the distinctive biological functions of each gender contribute to this
disparity. One significant factor is that women
are often advised to conceive before the age of 30, which can shorten and disrupt their scientific career paths. As a result
, women
may find their knowledge becomes outdated, and it is challenging to return to their positions after a long disruptive period due to
deterrents such
as childcare responsibilities, stagnation, and a perceived decrease in logical thinking ability. Consequently
, female scientists often struggle to compete with their male counterparts, who do not face such
disruptions in their careers. Additionally
, societal pressure from relatives can influence women
’s choice of majors, steering them towards stable jobs like accounting or reception work instead
of more demanding scientific fields.
Nevertheless
, there is a general consensus that these factors stifle world development to a lesser extent. The lack of female attendance in scientific classes has limited technical advancements because the perspectives of both genders are needed to generate innovative solutions. For instance
, the contributions of women
scientists like Marie Curie, who made groundbreaking discoveries in physics and chemistry, highlight the potential benefits of having more women
in science. Curie's discoveries of Polonium and Radium and her pioneering research in their applications, such
as the development of X-ray machines, have had profound impacts on medical diagnostics.
To conclude
, addressing and overcoming these detrimental prejudices can lead to a better world with more contributions from gifted women
in scientific fields.Submitted by lenam2k1 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
The essay offers a clear and relevant response to the prompt, providing reasons for the gender disparity in subject choice and arguing for change. However, expanding on the societal influence with more concrete examples could strengthen the argument.
coherence cohesion
The ideas in the essay are logically structured and easy to follow. However, some transitions could be smoother to enhance coherence, such as linking the ideas about societal expectations more clearly to the main argument.
coherence cohesion
The essay has a robust introduction and conclusion, framing the argument well.
task achievement
The inclusion of specific examples, like the mention of Marie Curie, effectively supports the main points and adds depth to the argument.