Reading for pleasure can develop imagination and language skills better than watching TV. To what extent you agree or disagree?

It is true that reading has an indispensable role to play in the enhancement of imagination and

language

skills.

Hence

, some people harbour a belief that reading is more helpful to elevate one's imaginative power and

language

learning than watching

TV

, whilst others hold the reverse viewpoint. I am inclined to stand with the

skeptics

Change the spelling

sceptics

show examples

. The discussion of

this

issue

as well as

my thoughts will be highlighted in the write-up.

Initially

, one of the main arguments for its rejection is that watching

TV

brings both visual and auditory stimulation which is beneficial to learning languages.

For example

, movies and series are considered to be efficient media for listening and speaking training since learners can improve their abilities in pleasant conditions.

By contrast

, books provide a relatively tedious way to deliver relevant knowledge. These indicate that watching

TV

indeed has some positive effects on the improvement of

language

skills. At the other end of the spectrum, visualizing the picture in one's brain can be inspiring

such

as some impressive scenes on

TV

which seize audiences' attention and make a direct delivery. As technology develops, the public tends to be stunned by scenes which go beyond imagination. The feasts for eyes and ears not only stimulate people's thoughts but

also

raise their visions with significant creativities.

Therefore

, watching

TV

is more like an inspiration to imagine rather than a restriction.

To sum up

, both ways have different advantages to develop imagination and

language

abilities.

However

, visual and acoustic inputs from

TV

will strengthen individuals' impressions and result in a more active consequence than reading.