It is more important to use the space in cities well than make them look beautiful. To what extent do you agree?

The question over whether the functionality of

space

or its aesthetic appeal in

cities

is important.

While

the visual appeal of a city can enhance its identity and attract tourists, it is crucial to recognize that the primary purpose of urban spaces is to serve the needs of its

residents

.

Therefore

, I agree that it is more important to

use

space

in

cities

well rather than to make them look beautiful. Efficient

use

of

space

in urban areas will impact the quality of life for its inhabitants. Well-organized

cities

with functional infrastructures,

such

as public transportation, hospitals, and schools, ensure that

residents

have access to essential services.

Cities

like Tokyo and Singapore are infamous for their efficient

use

of

space

. These

cities

are able to support high population densities

while

providing the necessary amenities.

This

efficiency minimizes the time and resources

residents

need to spend on daily activities,

as a result

improving their

overall

quality of life.

However

,

this

does not mean that aesthetics should be disregarded. A visually appealing city can increase morale and well-being among inhabitants. Preserving cultural buildings and public art can play a role in strengthening local pride.

However

,

this

heritage shouldn’t overshadow the

use

of urban design

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

but should complement it. In conclusion,

while

beauty plays a role in enhancing the charm of a city, the primary

use

of urban environments should be on the functional

use

of

space

. Ensuring that

cities

are well organized and efficient not only improves the quality of life for

residents

but

also

enhances sustainability. Balancing functionality with beauty can create urban spaces that are both practical and visually appealing.