Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did the training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Some argue that legislation should oblige professionals to work within the
country
in which they received their training, while
others assert that they should not be limited. Although
I acknowledge the concerns of the former group, I gravitate toward the latter statement.
Working in a country
where one
is educated can be beneficial for both individuals
and the society at large. First and foremost, a significant portion of individuals
' studies are funded by taxpayers, thereby citizens have the right to benefit from doctors' and engineers' services. By limiting expertise choices for the workplace, governments can ensure that people within the society profit from good services and are willing to contribute to the taxation programme. Moreover
, university curricula differ from one
country
to the other, as they have been planned based on indigenous needs. For instance
, pharmacists in China have to learn tai chi and acupuncture methods, practises that are neither taught nor used in other parts of the world. These studies necessitate professional settings to only hire individuals
who have graduated from local universities.
However
, these statements can be observed from another perspective. Confining expertise within the borders of a country
is inhumane. The notion that suggests we should limit expertise choices is against democratic law. All people pay taxes, and yet no one
can demand one
change their residential status based on taxpayers
interest. Change noun form
taxpayers'
taxpayer's
Therefore
, the disparity between professionals' choices and other groups not only disproves human rights but also
dissuades individuals
from obtaining higher degrees.
Additionally
, in developed countries, almost half of universities' seats are allocated to immigrants who wish to obtain their degrees and go back to serve their own country
. Requiring these people to stay can bring about further
problems. Firstly
, if one
forces others to work against their will, they will not be able to provide optimal guidance or make the finest product. Secondly
, providing housing and other required amenities for these graduates is demanding and can place an undue burden on the governments'
shoulders.
In conclusion, hiring graduates from local universities, Correct your spelling
government's
although
beneficial if become
an obligation, can cause Wrong verb form
becomes
irreparabale
ramifications.Correct your spelling
irreparable
Submitted by ghazalmoosavi79 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
coherence cohesion
It's important to ensure that each paragraph focuses on a central idea, which will enhance its coherence. Try to make sure your paragraphs are fully unified around one point before moving on to the next.
coherence cohesion
Expand your use of linking words. Although the essay is well-structured, increasing the variety and frequency of linking words can improve flow and connectivity between ideas.
task achievement
Ensure that your arguments are consistently clear and specific, and enhance them by providing precise details and examples where possible.
introduction conclusion present
The introduction effectively introduces the topic and presents a clear position without delay, making it easily accessible to the reader.
complete response
The essay provides a two-sided discussion, which effectively addresses the task requirement of discussing both views.
relevant specific examples
Your writing includes relevant examples, such as the one about pharmacists in China, which helps to illustrate the potential problems of the argument and grounds your points in reality.
Fully explain your ideas
To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).
For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:
- Paragraph 1 - Introduction
- Sentence 1 - Background statement
- Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
- Sentence 3 - Thesis
- Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
- Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
- Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
- Sentence 2 - Example
- Sentence 3 - Discussion
- Sentence 4 - Conclusion
- Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
- Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
- Sentence 2 - Example
- Sentence 3 - Discussion
- Sentence 4 - Conclusion
- Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
- Sentence 1 - Summary
- Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
- Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation
Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.